Mike Myers vs. Hinduism. Deepak Chopra vs Skeptics.

Mike Myers, comedian of Austin Powers fame, is apparently ruffling some feathers amongst Hindus with his upcoming film “The Love Guru.” I tend to be somewhat sympathetic to the concerns of religious people when films appear to ridicule or caricature their beliefs: particularly religious minorities that aren’t well understood in the U.S. to begin with. My sympathies don’t extend to complaining about the films themselves of course (religion shouldn’t be any more or less open to fair game ridicule than anything else): I can just understand the concerns about the negative cultural results.

It’s one thing to mock a culture we are all intimately familiar with: we have a solid basis of understanding that comedy can enhance or even challenge. It’s quite another thing when the only thing many people have to go on is a caricature. And while Hinduism deserves as much criticism and analysis as any cultural, religious, or political force, Hindus, as people, also deserve better understanding and acceptance as part of the bargain.

That said, what’s of particular interest to skeptics regarding this film are Myers’ comments about Deepak Chopra, who is considered by most skeptics to be the reigning king of new age, pseudoscientific woo. Myers claims that his character is based on Chopra, but also notes that Chopra is a close friend.

Myers… …says in an episode of the Sundance Channel’s “Iconoclasts” that Chopra, his longtime friend, was the inspiration for the Love Guru character.

“He is the basis of why I went down this path of a character like that, and it’s because I am interested in higher states of consciousness and I am interested in comedy,” Myers says. “The guru, he breaks down your barriers, gets you silly and gets you light so you’re in a place to receive love.”

Will Myers be poking fun at woo and alt-med in a way that skeptics can be proud of? Or will he be basically celebrating the Chopra-hype with a lighthearted endorsement of its ideas? Seems pretty ambiguous at this point, but its something to watch.

5 Responses to Mike Myers vs. Hinduism. Deepak Chopra vs Skeptics.

  1. Defending Deepak! Who Would Have Thunk It?

    Steven Novella is a well-known freethinker, debunker of cults and a neurologist on the faculty of Yale University’s School of Medicine. He has enjoyed a career as a leader of the New England Skeptical Society, producer of The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe podcast and as an activist with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI). I’ve enjoyed his work for many years. Recently, a good friend urged me to read his latest commentary at The NeuroLogicaBlog website. The title of the piece looked promising: Magic Man – Deepak Chopra. I could hardly wait to read it.

    Novella summarized his opinion of Chopra – Chopra thinks he has magic powers and that he can affect reality with his Deepakthoughts alone) and then quoted a remark Deepak made about his own power in referring to the magnitude 7.2 earthquake in Baja CA. Here is Deepak’s Twitter comment: Had a powerful meditation just now – caused an earthquake in Southern California. Was meditating on Shiva mantra & earth began to shake. Sorry about that.

    Novella basically had a fit. He wrote that he wondered if Chopra was kidding or seriously claiming he caused the quake in Baja? Then he added, Either possibility is disturbing. Then he described why either possibility was disturbing, at least in his opinion.

    If kidding, it was callus and confusing, a bad joke or poor judgment or an expression of supreme arrogance from someone who thinks he is a master of the universe.

    If serious, it suggests Chopra believes he can affect reality with his thoughts, which is what his writings about achieving god consciousness suggest. Novella ends concluding that Chopra sells what people want to buy – magic.

    Well, even though I have offered few kind words about Deepak Chopra and more than a few unkind ones, I thought in this case the good Dr. Novella was way off the mark. What’s more, I posted a comment at his website.

    I loathe the woo woo of Deepak and his spiritual ilk. But, I have little patience with political correctness, sanctimoniousness and, most of all, humorlessness.

    This is a first for me – defending Deepak, an act made more ironic in that it requires taking exception to a position adopted by an apostle of the freethinker school. But, I can’t help myself. I must say, lighten up, Steve. Sheesh. The take on Deepak’s remarks is prissy, humor-impaired and an affront to free speech.

    Sure, Deepak Chopra probably does think he has magical powers. He probably thinks he can affect reality with his thoughts alone. Such observations barely break the surface of the man’s delusions. But, the criticism here is of Deepak at his best – actually being funny, making fun of himself for a change.

    Deepak’s comment on his phony baloney magic is Saturday Night Live worthy! This is hilarious: Had a powerful meditation just now – caused an earthquake in Southern California. What a hoot. Good on ya, Deepak! And then this: Was meditating on Shiva mantra & earth began to shake. Sorry about that. Also hilarious. Come on – does a skeptic have to take everything literally? Are we freethinkers going to be labeled enforcers of piety?

    Could there be a Colbert Report, a Daily Show, a Real Time with Bill Maher or a Curb Your Enthusiasm if attempts at humor must be taken literally? If this attitude prevailed, where would that leave humorists like the late George Carlin, or Larry David, Chris Rock, Julia Sweeney and all the other on all sides of the political spectrum? No more irreverent or outrageous humor if Chopra’s version of such is deemed out of bounds. Who wants bounds, anyway? Is this not a case of reverse blasphemy by someone who most of the time could be counted on to cringe at censorship?

    Chopra should be encouraged to exercise his sense of humor, not pilloried by free speech advocates and champions of liberty. The use of humor is not disturbing. People use it at funerals, for heaven’s sake (just an expression). Humor serves many functions. Support it, even when you are not amused.

    The comments that Novella criticized were in fact the best of Deepak, in my view. He was spoofing his own woo woo. That’s delicious. Go Deepak.

    I urged Dr. Novella to revisit this commentary and offer a second opinion – one the opposite of his first take about Deepak on earthquakes. As noted, I commented on this blog, and got a response from Dr. Novella. Here it is:

    Donald – I appreciate your perspective, and I admit that I considered it prior to writing this blog. I don’t want to be in the position of deconstructing something said in jest.

    But in this case, it is not a stretch to argue that Chopra thinks he can change reality to that degree with his intention. This episode reflects that, whether or not it was a joke. So partly this is just an excuse to criticize Chopra for his mystical guru money-generating beliefs.

    And further, while I am NOT a defender of reverence or even good taste, I think it is arrogant on the part of Chopra to joke, soon after a quake that claimed lives, that he was responsible through meditation.

    I was quite deliberate in writing that this may have just been a joke gone wrong, and that is exactly why I prefaced my criticism as ‘less charitably.’

    A couple others responded. One wrote this:

    I’m with Donald here. It’s pretty apparent the comments were meant in jest. Even delusional woo masters are capable of cracking jokes and I also doubt that he was thinking about the loss of life when he tweeted. Pulling Chopra on this seems to be a bit opportunistic and if something similar happened in reverse I’m certain most people here would be complaining about how humorless the other side was. I don’t like Chopra or his brand of woo but he’s entitled to make bad jokes. And I’m also sure that lots of famous skeptical folk, especially the comedians, have made jokes that some people would find in bad taste. Chopra isn’t alone in that regard and like Donald suggests I get the impression it was meant to be self-deprecating rather than a claim for metaphysical responsibility.

    Bob Ludlow, a big fan of Dr. Novella, wrote:

    Okay, so I’m more on your side, from the standpoint that it was a somewhat gratuitous cheap-shot. On the other hand, Chopra is a deluded and dishonest con artist, a profiteering gasbag who has not earned the benefit of the doubt. The arrogant crap he preaches, partly under the cloak of pseudoscience and pseudo-medicine is deserving of the highest scorn and opprobrium. So when he smugly tweets that his meditation caused the earthquake, I’m assuming he’s addressing an audience of true believers. What if odious Pat Robertson ‘joked’ to his listeners that he was praying for the defeat of Satan when the Haitian earthquake struck? Or something like that — you get the idea. Or what if Rush Limbaugh made a pseudo self-deprecating joke. You know where these hate-mongering *&%^#$ are coming from, so they just aren’t funny. So I guess I won’t concede that what Chopra said was funny, even if so intended, because he was saying it in a context that assumed he has magical powers. If someone imitating Chopra had said it on SNL, then it could have been funny.

    Still, I like to think if I were in Novella’s position, I would have passed on that blog.

    Finally, one last comment:

    I think this was one of your less inspired posts, Steve. Useless even. I don’t even think it was tasteless. The earthquake was tragic but living in Southern California, you grow accustomed to small shakes. A big quake from far off feels the same as a small one close by. I think the tweet would have been funny under the circumstances, even if Chopra is a lunatic.

    OK, there you have it – my defense of Deepak. Now for the important part of this. What do YOU think?

  2. I would like to begin by saying, thank you for providing me with the information I’ve been searching for. I’ve been searching the net for two hours looking for it and wish I would have located your website sooner. Not only did I find what I was looking for, but found answers to questions I never thought to ask myself. Thank you for your wonderful web-site!

  3. Both drugs have also been denied FDA approval the first time around and
    are awaiting news on their second attempt. Cucumber contains
    sterols which can help to lower cholesterol and prevent carbohydrates from converting to body fat.
    Many people don’t have the time to weight themselves every day, but checking the scale on a regular basis can definitely help when you’re working to lose weight and keep it

  4. Samira says:

    Both drugs have also been denied FDA approval the first time
    around and are awaiting news on their second attempt.

    Vitamin B3 or also called as Niacin is important in weight loss because it is responsible for the regulation of thyroid hormones and also in
    sugar levels in the body. When you’re about to start on your weight loss plan, it’s a
    good idea to think about your end goal and chunk it
    down into smaller goals.

  5. Foundation for Defense of Democracies

    Mike Myers vs. Hinduism. Deepak Chopra vs Skeptics. | The Bad Idea Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: